Tomas Machac vs Matteo Arnaldi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Mar at 05:57 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Machac vs M. Arnaldi

CZE
3
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Machac 3 - 0 Arnaldi
They have played 7 sets in total, with Tomas Machac winning 6 and Matteo Arnaldi winning 1. The last match between Tomas Machac and Matteo Arnaldi was at the Miami Open - Miami, 22-03-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Tomas Machac getting the victory 6-2 1-6 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Machac | 3 |
Arnaldi | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R2) Miami Open - Miami(03-22-25)
(R4) Miami Open - Miami(03-26-24)
(Q3) Dubai Duty Free Tennis Championships - Dubai(02-26-23)
T. Machac vs M. Arnaldi H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$3,792,615 | Career Prize Money | $2,492,840 |
65.35% (281-149) | Career Total W/L | 59.90% (236-158) |
3 | Hard | 0 |
11 | Titles | 6 |
3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
57.50% (23-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.24% (19-23) |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
T. Machac vs M. Arnaldi Match Preview:
When scrutinizing the numbers, how do Arnaldi and Machac stack up against each other on their second serve? In the past six months, Arnaldi has emerged victorious on 48.9% of his second serve endeavors, marginally edging out Machac, who lags behind ever so slightly at 48.88%. This slender difference in second serve efficacy can be pivotal in determining match outcomes.
Diving into the realm of return games, there's a clear advantage for Machac. When it comes to snagging points off their opponent’s second serve, Machac outpaces Arnaldi with an impressive 45.69% compared to Arnaldi’s 42.9%. However, in the battle against first serves, Arnaldi takes the lead, winning 26.04% of points, while Machac remains at 21.75%. These figures can be instrumental in predicting the favored player in their head-to-head encounters.
Pressure moments—who crumbles, and who conquers? Arnaldi demonstrates resilience, averting 57.79% of breakpoints in recent fixtures, surpassing Machac’s 54.93%. Such tenacity during crucial stages could be the deciding factor for in-game betting insights.
Exploring their overall performance in the past year reveals Arnaldi's 53.7% match success rate (29 wins and 25 losses), a stark contrast to Machac’s sturdier 61.67% (37 wins and 23 losses). These broader statistics paint a picture where Machac stands as the more consistent performer.
Surface preferences reveal stark contrasts. Arnaldi thrives on clay, boasting a career win percentage of 66%, but falters on indoor hard courts with just 41%. Conversely, Machac reigns supreme on hard courts, securing 69% of his matches, while grass remains his Achilles' heel at 50%. Such insights might tip the scales depending on the surface they engage on.
When assessing tournament tiers, should we evaluate by the level of competition? Arnaldi finds himself amidst the Masters series, with a 57.14% win rate, whereas Machac dominates the Main tour, clocking a robust 68.97% success. These figures suggest Machac’s capability to outperform peers more consistently across varied tournament levels.
Direct encounters between Arnaldi and Machac clearly lean in favor of the latter, winning both their encounters and all four sets they've contested. The latest match unfolded at the Miami Open, concluding swiftly in Machac’s favor with straight sets (6-3, 6-3). Their head-to-head encounters typically average a match length of 1:07:05, inferring competitive, albeit short-lived, battles.
In high-pressure scenarios, neither player has engaged in a tiebreak against each other or encountered a deciding set in their encounters, leaving speculation around how they might fare in such situations. However, against all players, Machac boasts a 67% win rate in deciding sets over the last year, overshadowing Arnaldi’s 47%. This statistic hints at which player might have the mental edge under duress.
Breaking down opponent quality, over the past year, Arnaldi’s adversaries average a rank of 64.41, slightly higher than Machac’s slate of foes, who average 59.6. This small discrepancy hints at Arnaldi occasionally facing marginally tougher competition. Yet, in transforming break opportunities, Machac edges out with a 31.25% conversion, compared to Arnaldi’s 28.7%, another glimpse into potential critical match turning points.
Analyzing all these metrics, the scales of victory appear to tip in favor of Machac. His statistical edge in historical performance, player-level experience, and consistency in matches suggests he is better positioned to clinch victory in their impending face-off.
Tomas Machac vs Matteo Arnaldi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Machac vs M. Arnaldi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
6 | Sets Won | 1 |
37 | Games Won | 18 |
9 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
1:19:39 | Average Match Time | 1:19:39 |
65% (114/175) | 1st Serve % | 61% (103/169) |
71% (81/114) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (66/103) |
57% (35/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (25/66) |
55% (12/22) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
46% (78/169) | Return Points Win % | 34% (59/175) |
100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Machac Recent Matches Played
M. Arnaldi Recent Matches Played

T. Machac vs M. Arnaldi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
65.35% (281/149) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.90% (236/158) |
63.70% (644/367) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.89% (554/403) |
54.86% (5232/4305) | Games Win/Loss | 52.61% (4788/4313) |
67.44% (87/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.71% (85/55) |
62.20% (79/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.35% (132/70) |
67.52% (106/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35.71% (15/27) |
52.94% (9/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 40.00% (4/6) |
0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
1893 | Aces Total | 1585 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
844 | Total Double Faults | 1105 |
1:36:32 | Average Match Time | 1:45:47 |
345.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 300.58 |
62% (17993/29115) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16273/27645) |
71% (12752/17964) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (11125/16273) |
54% (6037/11148) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5705/11367) |
43% (1300/2994) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1147/2689) |
40% (12003/30006) | Return Points Win % | 40% (10757/27014) |
64.81% (35/19) | Slam W/L | 56.25% (18/14) |
51.35% (19/18) | Masters W/L | 55.36% (31/25) |
72.73% (8/3) | Cups W/L | 80.00% (4/1) |
63.51% (47/27) | Main Tour W/L | 46.97% (31/35) |
67.44% (116/56) | Challenger W/L | 59.84% (73/49) |
69.23% (54/24) | Futures W/L | 70.27% (78/33) |
69% (260/378) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (220/362) |
53% (18/34) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (12/28) |
58% (93/160) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (74/129) |
53% (64/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (68/133) |
88% (284/249) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (239/197) |
10% (284/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (239/42) |
21% (145/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (154/37) |